A Random Conversation With Cou…

This is a random conversation with that same friend of mine from the spaceship post. Here to referred to as Cou. There will be several of these, with different people mind you, but mostly with Cou, and Curt. So here we go:

*Note* As with the Spaceship post, let me stress again, that I base my theories on absolutely nothing, and that i have no idea what I’m talking about.

jacob: Do you watch The Universe?

me: eveyday, sometimes it’s neat, like the moon last night was phasing horizontally instead of vertically, i didn’t know it could do that

jacob: And if your not, you should watch UFO Hunters

me: i am one

jacob: No, i’m talking about the shows on History channel

9:51 AM me: oh when do they come on?

9:54 AM jacob: The Universe comes on Tuesdays and I think UFO Hunters comes on Thursdays.

9:55 AM In the universe, they talk about everything from black holes to the possibility of time travel.

9:58 AM me: bah! time travel’s a myth, and implausible even by Einstein’s ludicrous THEORY of Relativity

E=mc2 = WRONG

9:59 AM on a side note, did you see the moon last night

10:03 AM the internet just broke

10:04 AM jacob: no, it was to cloudy here. Einsteins theory of relativity explains that massive objects in space create massive gravity fields (i.e. our sun) which also explains why exploding stars can create a Black hole. The easiest way to time travel and worm hole travel would be to create massive gravity fields between points. When the points touch, you have a worm hole.

10:05 AM me: INCORRECT

Because the basis for the theory of relativity is a lie

10:06 AM jacob: howso?

me: E=MC2′d is wrong

10:07 AM jacob: disprove it then

10:08 AM me: he just put that together do make some sense out of things, you can’t prove it, that’s why it’s still classified a Theory and not scientific law.Easily you ready

E is energy M is mass C is supposed to be a constant which is the speed of light right

we good so far

10:10 AM jacob: yup.

10:11 AM me: and the speed of light is calculated as the speed at which light from the sun reaches objects we can see, and in turn bounces off said objects directly at our ocular cavities, correct. Now the speed of light and A light year are directly proportional because they are both related to the same source. BUT they are NOT the same….? why? I’ll tell you why…. and Here’s where the discrepancies come in…..

5 minutes

10:16 AM me: 1. e=mc2′d Meaning they are squaring a Theoretical constant, if you square said constant, it’s not a constant it becomes an unconstant, thus disproving the theory all by itself, from it’s own self
2. BUT lets not even look at it from that angle, lets take it from another angle.. The speed of light is based on light from the sun/other heavenly bodies, but mainly the sun, cause it’s our light source right.. So like i said the speed of light, and a light year are directly related, but not the same, it should equal the speed of light exactly, so why doesn’t it.. .???

10:17 AM let me know when your caught up

5 minutes

10:22 AM jacob: I’m caught up

me: Because of a known Law…. Doppler’s
We know for a fact from Doppler shift that the Universe is Expanding, And since the universe is expanding the light year is becoming longer… thus Decreasing the inherent speed of light(by the Theory that is) Which is true as a whole, but as per our perception it’s not. to us it’s still the same, cause if “Light” as in all “light from the sun” where to really slow down, we would start to physically see a into different “higher” spectrum /wavelenghts of light

10:23 AM so why don’t we, because light isn’t slowing down….???What?? but i just said e=mc2′d was wrong cause light blah blah blah blah blah, Right

10:24 AM And there in lies the problem, Stieny knew it, I know it, i figured all that part out for myself when i was like 8(*and there in lies the problem, i also haven’t updated my theory since i was , so what’s my theory

10:25 AM jacob: 1) the speed of light is a measurment. A measurement of light from the sun, to the earth. So when they say it would take 85,000 light years to reach our next closest star, they aren’t talking about the light from that star to earth. They are talking about the standard measurement (i.e. feet) we use to get there.

me: I think what Einstein was really looking for, was something wasn’t even proven to exist until recently, and it’s still up in the air

Yes i know

10:26 AM i said they arent’ the same, but From OUR SUN TO US it should be

jacob: So the speed of light is a constant because if the distance from earth to the sun were expanding, then our orbit would also be expanding therefore expanding the length of time between years.

10:27 AM me: Here’s what i think E=MQ where Q is the speed of subatomic particles traveling thru the universe(call them quarks, neutrino’s , dark matter, antimatter) whatever you want to call them

jacob: And lets not forget that if the earth were 6 degrees closer or further, life would not be the same on earth as we know it

10:28 AM me: yes and it is lest say at like .00017mins per year or something like that

10:29 AM jacob: Then the speed of light is a measurement that was standardized when the speed of light was founded. The fact that light is taking .00017 min longer to hit us is irrelevant.

me: what Einstein couldn’t figure out was the Q, cause he couldn’t prove they existed/didn’t even know they existed, so how could he, so he used a known constant that was close enough to the number he needed when squared and that’s how The Theory was born

10:30 AM exactly

read the last part there

10:31 AM jacob: Well no, he couldn’t know that neutrinos existed. His theory is from 1940 something and neutrinos weren’t known to exist until latter part the last century.

10:32 AM me: that’s my point

10:33 AM all our know particle physics is based on a Theory that’s inherently wrong, we have reached our limits based on it’s properties, and we need a revamp

everything needs to be updated, but it’s not going to be cause it’s Einstein

10:34 AM it’s not Billy’s theory of Relativity, it’s Einstein’s so nobody’s got the huzztpah to come in and say, Uh, that’s wrong

10:36 AM Except Me, but i’m nobody so it doesn’t matter

10:37 AM i think something weirds up with the moon, last night, me leighann and lauren all saw it, we were here, and lauren was in SouthHaven and we all saw the same thing, but i can’t find any references to it anywhere on the webs

10:38 AM i know good and well the phases of the moon can’t be horizontal or vertical or.. it made a bowl cresent

10:39 AM jacob: Could be the wobble of the earth

10:40 AM Did you know that the star on Orion’s shoulder could go supernova any day? Well anytime between now and the next few hundred years. Technically it could have already happened.

End Random Garbage……